Case Study Deskcasestudydesk.com
SoftwareSourced

Case Study: Vercept reached 5× performance vs. OpenAI and ~30% cost savings on Together AI

Vercept Case StudySourced & dated by Case Study Desk
Key facts · TL;DR
Company
Vercept
Industry
Software
Challenge
Standard inference frameworks failed at required speed and accuracy
Headline result
Computer-automation models outperforming OpenAI while saving on cost

Key results

performance vs. OpenAI
computer-automation tasks
92%
ScreenSpot v1 accuracy
vs. OpenAI's 18.3%
~30%
cost savings
vs. hyperscalers
<24 hr
model deployment cycle

The challenge

Vercept builds AI that automates computer tasks, where small per-step latencies compound across long task chains and cause errors. Standard inference frameworks could not deliver the accuracy and price-performance the workload needed.

The solution

Vercept worked with Together AI to optimize and serve its models with autoscaling infrastructure and flexible term lengths, enabling a model-deployment cycle under 24 hours.

There is no comparison on price—we easily save ~30% on costs for similar terms.

LW
Luca Weihs
Co-founder, Vercept

The results, in context

Together AI's page reports Vercept achieved 92% accuracy on ScreenSpot v1 versus OpenAI's 18.3% (with similar gains on ScreenSpot v2 and GroundUI Web), delivering roughly 5× better performance than OpenAI on computer-automation tasks, alongside about 30% cost savings versus hyperscalers.

Products used

Together AI Dedicated EndpointsTogether AI Serverless Inference